When it comes to compensation philosophy, your equity comp “percentile philosophy” moves the needle substantially more than your cash comp philosophy.
Let’s explore this concept, and look at some sample benchmarks to illustrate the point.
“What percentile of the market do you pay at?” I ask a lot of companies this question, and three things surprise about the responses.
1. I seldom hear a customer explicitly say a number that is less than the 50th percentile. Yet mathematically, half of the market has to pay below the 50th percentile.
2. Companies generally fall into one of four buckets, and it’s usually tricky to identify which bucket they are in without a few more follow-up questions:
3. I ask if companies share their percentile philosophy with candidates and employees. The answer is usually “no” across the board, sometimes yes for cash, and seldom yes for both cash and equity.
This begs the question—what is the importance of a definitive percentile for your cash ranges vs the importance of a definitive percentile for your equity targets/guidelines/ranges?
{{mid-cta}}
Turns out, the benchmark distributions look very different for cash vs equity distributions. We analyzed P3 SWEs at public tech companies within Pave’s dataset to illustrate an example of how equity comp has substantially more variance than cash compensation.
From this, we can see that, in general:
The equity compensation philosophy you decide on potentially carries substantially more weight than your cash compensation philosophy. Stock-based compensation is not "free lunch".
What does your company do to set its cash and equity compensation guidelines?
View cash and equity benchmarks from 8,500+ companies with Pave's free Market Data product.