I was recently told that Sundar Pichai, CEO of Google and self-made billionaire, has been taking 1:1 recruiting phone calls with AI & ML software engineer candidates in their mid-20s who have competitive offers from OpenAI that tip the scale at nearly $1M annually. Meanwhile, Walter Isaacson’s biography on Elon Musk talks about Musk throwing around $1M+ sign-on bonus packages for top AI & ML candidates he was trying to poach to join xAI.
This being said, at a recent dinner with Total Rewards leaders, I was told that while there are certainly “outlandish” comp stories from the outliers…the rest of the market for AI talent is “high but not crazy”. Especially outside of the Bay Area Bubble.
What are we seeing in the compensation market data? Have million-dollar packages become the 'new normal,' or are such cases merely outliers and part of the mythology that fuels the AI hype cycle?
In this market data analysis, Machine Learning ICs are indeed paid a bit higher than Software Engineering Generalists.
However, the “comp premium” for ML (as the best available proxy for AI) appears to be somewhat limited (~7-8%) at this point in time across the broader market. This suggests that the hype cycle stories of the “$1M comp packages” are from a vocal minority of extreme outliers rather than the “new normal”.
P4 (Senior) Median Benchmarks:
1️⃣ Machine Learning => $210,000 | High Confidence (n = 51-100)
2️⃣ Software Engineering Generalist => $196,000 | Very High Confidence (n = 1,001+)
P5 (Staff) Median Benchmarks:
1️⃣ Machine Learning => $244,612 | Confident (n = 11-30)
2️⃣ Software Engineering Generalist => Very High Confidence (n = 1,001+)