Managing market pricing is a juggling act. Compensation professionals must balance limited resources, disjointed data, and employee expectations, and doing so is easier said than done.Â
‍
In a recent market pricing webinar, Pave tapped two industry experts—Evan Salisbury, Head of Total Rewards at Ancestry, and Kaylyn Reid, Head of Total Rewards and Analytics at GoFundMe—to dig into the details of how they approach market pricing at their organizations. We rounded up their insights to create this playbook, which can help you conquer your compensation market pricing processes.Â
‍
Keep reading to get their tips on how to:
{{mid-cta}}
‍
Job architecture serves as a roadmap for your business. It typically outlines reporting structures, role progression, job responsibilities, and competencies but can be as straightforward as defining job levels and descriptions.Â
It helps you navigate recruitment, performance management, and compensation planning as you scale, so “the earlier you set your job architecture, the better,” shared Kaylyn. “You don’t have to go the whole gambit and create a ton of jobs and ladders, but setting the foundation helps relieve stress later on,” she continued.Â
‍
When designing your job architecture, it’s helpful to consider your growth stage. If you work for a startup where priorities change often, creating a roadmap that will guide you for the next 6-18 months may be best. More mature organizations usually build their job architecture with the next few years in mind.Â
‍
In either case, it’s important to revisit your job architecture regularly – it isn’t a set-it-and-forget-it exercise. You should reevaluate your job architecture as your company evolves, especially if you’re:
‍
Or, sometimes, the right time to reevaluate your job architecture is simply, “when it stops working for your organization,” shared Kaylyn.
Once you’ve laid the foundation with job architecture, the next step is to decide how employees will be paid. There are many approaches to setting salary bands, but here are a few of the most common ones.
Companies that use a job-based structure create salary ranges for each position within the organization.Â
‍
This approach can create trust with employees and help further pay transparency efforts. However, developing tens or hundreds of job-based ranges is an extremely tedious and time-consuming process that can be difficult to maintain, especially as the business grows.
Function-based salary ranges group together roles that have similar compensation structures.Â
‍
This creates a simplified approach to managing compensation bands as there are fewer ranges to monitor and track. The flip side is that this approach is not as granular as job-based.
‍
Function-based ranges can also boost pay transparency efforts. As Kaylyn shared, “Having function-based ranges creates equitability within the teams that have a lot of roles that are really similar to each other.”
A broad-based structure slots jobs into ranges and assigns them grades based on the relative market value of the position.
‍
This approach can be challenging for smaller organizations with fewer resources because it requires frequent reevaluation of pay grades and robust communication with employees.Â
Market pricing isn’t possible without real-time, relevant, and accurate market data. Data gives you insights into market trends and enables more informed compensation decision-making. But, not every data provider offers the same benefits. Building a comprehensive data set often involves using multiple compensation data sources, like survey data vendors and compensation management platforms.
‍
‍
Once you’re equipped with robust market data, consider layering in geo tiers. Many companies today take a location-based approach to account for a distributed workforce.
‍
The team at Ancestry uses three tiers, including a premium market in San Francisco, an intermediary market with some select cities, and a national average for all other cities. GoFundMe also uses three geo tiers – one US national tier and two premium tiers for cities with higher cost of labor like San Francisco, New York City, Austin, Boston, Washington DC, and Los Angeles.Â
‍
Finally, with any data, it’s necessary to double-check the details. Data is rarely 100% perfect, so trust your gut. Validate if your ranges make logical sense because, as Kaylyn shared, “the bands we set are only as good as the data that goes into them.”Â
After you’ve chosen your salary approach, you need to share relevant details with employees.Â
‍
Here are tips from Evan and Kaylyn on how to communicate pay information effectively.
Compensation market pricing is typically a nuanced and complex process. With Pave, you can improve efficiency and build confidence in your ranges.Â
‍
Pave Market Pricing enables you to aggregate all your market data sources, map that data to your job architecture, fill in data gaps, and automate range generation.Â
‍
Get a demo to learn how you can get time back in your day and build more accurate compensation bands.
View the recording of “Market Pricing: From Pains to Process” on-demand, for free.